EU Annex 11 & Annex 22 Guide (with revision preview)
What Annex 11 requires today, what the revision changes, and how Annex 22 (AI in GMP) reshapes the assurance stack.
EU GMP Annex 11 governs computerised systems used in GMP-regulated manufacturing. It covers risk management, supplier assessment, validation, data integrity, audit trails, electronic signatures, change control and periodic review. Annex 22 is the companion annex for artificial intelligence, setting out what regulators expect when a model contributes to a GMP decision.
Before go-live — Annex 11 clauses 1 to 4
- 1
Risk management (cl. 1)
Applied across the whole system lifecycle, with the depth of validation justified by documented risk rather than habit.
- 2
Personnel and roles (cl. 2)
Defined responsibilities and close working between process owner, system owner, IT and QA.
- 3
Supplier and service provider assessment (cl. 3)
Formal assessment of anyone supplying or hosting the system, with agreements defining each party's responsibilities.
- 4
Validation documentation (cl. 4)
Evidence the system is fit for intended use, with an up-to-date system inventory and traceability from requirement to test.
In operation — clauses 5 to 11
The operational heart of the annex, and where most inspection findings land.
- 5
Data interfaces (cl. 5)
Built-in checks that data transferred between systems arrives correctly and completely.
- 6
Accuracy checks (cl. 6)
Where data is entered manually and matters critically, an additional check — by a second person or by the system.
- 7
Data storage (cl. 7)
Protected from damage, backed up, and restorability actually demonstrated rather than assumed.
- 8
Printouts (cl. 8)
Clear printed copies obtainable, and for batch-release records, any change made since the original entry is visible.
- 9
Audit trails (cl. 9)
Generated for GMP-relevant changes and deletions, with reasons recorded, and regularly reviewed.
- 10
Change and configuration management (cl. 10)
Changes made only through a controlled process.
- 11
Periodic evaluation (cl. 11)
Systems reviewed periodically to confirm they remain valid and compliant. The most commonly overdue obligation in the annex.
Controls and continuity — clauses 12 to 17
- 12
Security (cl. 12)
Access limited to authorised people, with a record of who has which rights and a periodic review of it.
- 13
Incident management (cl. 13)
System failures and data errors recorded, assessed and investigated for root cause.
- 14
Electronic signatures (cl. 14)
Permanently linked to the record, carrying date and time, with the same weight as a handwritten signature.
- 15
Batch release (cl. 15)
Where a system is used for certification, only the Qualified Person may certify, and the system must identify who did.
- 16
Business continuity (cl. 16)
Documented arrangements to continue the process when the system is unavailable, proportionate to criticality.
- 17
Archiving (cl. 17)
Archived data remains readable and retrievable for its retention period, through platform changes.
Annex 22 — where AI changes the picture
Annex 22 complements Annex 11 for AI; it does not replace it. Electronic record and signature obligations still apply to AI-assisted records.
- 18
Intended use defined and bounded
What the model does, on what inputs, for which decision — narrow enough to be tested.
- 19
No autonomous GMP-critical decisions
A qualified human remains accountable for decisions affecting product quality or patient safety.
- 20
Test data independent of training data
Performance demonstrated against a held-out, representative set that never touched training.
- 21
Explainability proportionate to risk
You can account for how an output was produced to the degree the decision warrants.
- 22
Drift monitoring in production
Performance tracked after deployment, because an unchanged model can still stop being fit for use.
- 23
Model change control
Retraining, fine-tuning and vendor model updates treated as changes to a validated system.
- 24
Documented fallback
The process continues with the AI disabled — written down, tested, and known to the people who would use it.
Annex 11 applies to GMP. GCP, GLP and GDP have their own expectations for computerised systems that overlap but are not identical — check the predicate rules for your activity rather than assuming Annex 11 covers everything.
Annex 11 and 21 CFR Part 11 cover similar ground with different emphasis. If you operate in both the EU and the US, assess against both; satisfying one does not automatically satisfy the other.
This is a working aid, not a regulatory document, and it does not replace your own quality system procedures.
Explore related resources, products and services: GxP Copilot, TraceDraft, validation services, AI transformation.
Sources
Primary documents referred to on this page, from their official publishers.
- 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures · eCFR (US)
- EudraLex Volume 4: EU Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines · European Commission
- EU GMP Annex 11: Computerised Systems (current version) · European Commission
- Consultation on EU GMP Chapter 4, Annex 11 and draft Annex 22 (Artificial Intelligence) · European Commission
Common questions
Prefer to talk first? Chat with us on WhatsApp or book a call with an expert.
What is EU GMP Annex 11?
Annex 11 is the European GMP annex covering computerised systems used in regulated manufacturing. Across seventeen clauses it addresses risk management, personnel, supplier assessment, validation, data storage, audit trails, change control, periodic evaluation, security, incident management, electronic signatures, batch release, business continuity and archiving.
What is the difference between Annex 11 and 21 CFR Part 11?
Part 11 is a US FDA regulation focused specifically on electronic records and electronic signatures. Annex 11 is an EU GMP annex covering the whole lifecycle of a computerised system, including supplier assessment, business continuity and periodic evaluation. They overlap substantially but satisfying one does not automatically satisfy the other.
What is EU Annex 22?
Annex 22 is the EU GMP annex addressing artificial intelligence. It remains a draft, not yet adopted, so treat it as readiness guidance rather than a current obligation. It sets out a defined and bounded intended use, performance demonstrated against test data independent of training data, human accountability for GMP-critical decisions, explainability proportionate to risk, drift monitoring in production, model change control, and a documented fallback.
How often is periodic evaluation required under Annex 11?
The annex requires periodic evaluation but does not fix an interval — you set it based on the system's criticality, its change history and its incident record, and justify the choice. Annually is common for critical systems. Evaluation that is overdue or never performed is among the most frequent Annex 11 findings.
Does Annex 11 require audit trail review?
Yes. Clause 9 requires audit trails for GMP-relevant changes and deletions, and expects them to be reviewed regularly. Having an audit trail that nobody reads is a recurring finding: the control is the review, not the existence of the log.
Put this to work on your system.
Bring a URS. We show you risk-sized testing on your own requirements.
- We reply within one business day
- We run your URS live on the call
- You get a clear plan for your system